A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out involving prospective neighbours in excess of the construction of a wall at a coastal web page within a north Dublin suburb, a case which has attracted national consideration subsequent an Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed family house at Sutton Strand, wherever allegations of planning breaches, environmental considerations, and prolonged-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Times post about René Collier and also the Irish Instances short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has advanced right into a really publicised authorized battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than development works at the website on Dublin Street, Sutton, where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a corporation director respectively, find to create their loved ones house. The situation is becoming emblematic of wider disputes along Eire’s coastline, in which enhancement pressures collide with environmental protections as well as the sensitivities of founded citizens. According to the Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting made by their potential neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted less than arranging permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, each inhabitants of Dublin Road, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their setting up permission by developing a wall outside of the boundaries of their internet site, leading to an encroachment on the Specific Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to the dispute, as such places are issue to stringent controls below European and Irish environmental law. Within their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments might have Long lasting ecological consequences, specially inside a sensitive coastal atmosphere for instance Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They're in breach in their preparing permission, and say the wall, which happens to be partly designed, is in the correct position. Their lawful staff has characterised the action being an make an effort to delay or frustrate a lawful improvement. The few accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding so as to preserve their view, an allegation that's been recurring in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal scheduling disputes, in which views of the sea are both equally very prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described extraordinary initiatives through the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by means of ocean in storm to photograph the positioning, Based on sworn evidence referenced inside the Irish Times. In one account, Rene Collier waded via waistline-significant drinking water during a storm to photograph the site Irish Times, a picture which has considering the fact that come to be emblematic of the intensity of the dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were meant to Obtain Visible evidence of the wall’s situation relative to tidal lines and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website with the sea Irish Instances claimed, describing how the two Adult men entered the water through serious weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading as a result of storm water to photograph the site became The most placing descriptions to emerge from court docket reporting. The Irish Times post about accountant Paul Feely famous that these kinds of steps had been cited to demonstrate the plaintiffs’ perception that the wall extended into a location afflicted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument that the SAC was getting encroached on.
The situations at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been lined intimately via the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Periods 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Situations January 27 2026 became widely searched phrases as readers sought to grasp the qualifications and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court listened to even further submissions on whether or not interim orders needs to be granted to halt building pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a important moment from the legal timeline.
At the Main of your dispute is a disagreement above boundaries, organizing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely sustain that the wall, as built, goes beyond what was approved and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, is described as meticulous in his assessment of arranging documents, maps, and conditions connected for the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both equally stressed that their motion is inspired by issue for environmental safety and adherence to preparing regulation. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving a private view, insisting rather Paul Feely and Rene Collier that it is about guaranteeing that advancement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they may have described their extensive-standing link to the world and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a pair merely seeking to create a relatives house in accordance Along with the law. They deny that the wall encroaches on the Exclusive Region of Conservation and say that each one will work have been carried out determined by Experienced advice and accepted ideas. Their attorneys have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the remarkable actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, like coming into The ocean all through a storm, do not alter the fundamental points.
The situation has also lifted broader questions on how setting up disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute about development of wall at coastal internet site has grown to be a shorthand description for your condition a large number of observers see as ever more popular. As sea ranges increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation amongst non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats has become extra contentious.
The Irish Situations posting about René Collier pointed out the businessman experienced previously been involved with neighborhood advocacy on planning and environmental challenges, however not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Situations write-up about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people today from really diverse Expert backgrounds can discover on their own aligned in these kinds of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, are becoming synonymous Together with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning with the sea Irish Occasions protection emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by midsection-superior drinking water throughout a storm to photograph the location Irish Periods and René Collier waded through waist-large water through a storm to photograph the website Irish Moments are phrases that appeared regularly in coverage, reflecting each the Actual physical actuality from the coastline and the symbolic mother nature of the act. For supporters with the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated commitment; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an abnormal technique.
As being the High Court proceedings continue on, the result continues to be unsure. The courtroom must ascertain whether or not the wall as built complies with setting up permission and irrespective of whether any encroachment right into a Exclusive Place of Conservation has happened. The lawful arguments are sophisticated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal data, and arranging ailments. Nevertheless the human factor remains central: neighbours who will have to Dwell along with one another prolonged after the lawful prices are already paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about development functions at the site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, even so the implications of the situation extend beyond that tackle. For planners, developers, and residents alike, the dispute serves as a reminder of the value of clarity in planning permissions and sensitivity in coastal enhancement. What's more, it underscores how rapidly an area disagreement can escalate when elementary concerns for example environmental defense and residence legal rights are perceived being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand continues to be an area of normal splendor and contested boundaries. The wall on the centre on the dispute stands partially designed, a physical manifestation of unresolved authorized concerns. Regardless of whether it will eventually be altered, removed, or done as planned will rely upon the court docket’s conclusions. Right up until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will very likely go on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to one of the most intently viewed setting up disputes in north Dublin recently.