A bitter High Court dispute has broken out amongst prospective neighbours more than the development of the wall at a coastal site within a north Dublin suburb, a circumstance that has attracted national awareness following an Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed family members dwelling at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of preparing breaches, environmental fears, and extended-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Instances article about René Collier along with the Irish Times report about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as a local disagreement has developed into a very publicised legal battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than construction functions at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a company director respectively, seek to make their spouse and children property. The situation has grown to be emblematic of wider disputes together Eire’s coastline, the place advancement pressures collide with environmental protections as well as the sensitivities of set up people. Based on the Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall becoming manufactured by their possible neighbours goes past the boundaries permitted less than setting up permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both equally citizens of Dublin Highway, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their planning permission by developing a wall over and above the boundaries in their internet site, leading to an encroachment on the Distinctive Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central for the dispute, as a result locations are subject matter to demanding controls underneath European and Irish environmental regulation. In their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments might have Long lasting ecological penalties, specially within a sensitive coastal ecosystem such as Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They're in breach of their organizing permission, and say the wall, which is partially constructed, is in the correct situation. Their legal workforce has characterised the action as an make an effort to delay or frustrate a lawful progress. The few accuse litigants of looking for to halt homebuilding so that you can protect their see, an allegation which has been recurring in court docket and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the center of numerous coastal scheduling disputes, in which sights of The ocean are both remarkably prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described spectacular endeavours because of the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded via ocean in storm to photograph the website, In accordance with sworn evidence referenced in the Irish Periods. In a single account, Rene Collier waded through midsection-high water in the course of a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Periods, a picture that has because grow to be emblematic with the intensity from the dispute. These steps weren't simply symbolic; they were being meant to Get visual proof on the wall’s situation relative to tidal strains and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning from your sea Irish Times noted, describing how the two Males entered the drinking water in the course of intense climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by storm drinking water to photograph the site turned Just about the most striking descriptions to emerge from court reporting. The Irish Times short article about accountant Paul Feely pointed out that this kind of actions were cited to display the plaintiffs’ belief which the wall prolonged into an Paul Feely area influenced by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was becoming encroached upon.
The gatherings at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 ended up lined in detail through the national push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Occasions 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Situations January 27 2026 grew to become widely searched phrases as viewers sought to be aware of the background and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court listened to additional submissions on irrespective of whether interim orders needs to be granted to halt development pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a essential second while in the lawful timeline.
With the core with the dispute is really a disagreement over boundaries, organizing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely sustain which the wall, as made, goes past what was authorized and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has actually been called meticulous in his assessment of arranging paperwork, maps, and ailments hooked up for the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have the two stressed that their motion is enthusiastic by concern for environmental safety and adherence to setting up regulation. They reject promises that the case is about preserving A personal watch, insisting alternatively that it is about guaranteeing that improvement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limits. In affidavits, they have got described their very long-standing connection to the world as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a pair merely endeavoring to produce a household property in accordance Along with the regulation. They deny that the wall encroaches with a Unique Space of Conservation and say that all will work are actually completed determined by Expert assistance and authorized plans. Their attorneys have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the remarkable actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as getting into The ocean during a storm, usually do not change the fundamental info.
The situation has also elevated broader questions about how preparing disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute above building of wall at coastal internet site has grown to be a shorthand description to get a scenario that lots of observers see as ever more frequent. As sea levels rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation concerning personal land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats has started to become additional contentious.
The Irish Instances post about René Collier pointed out the businessman had Earlier been involved in community advocacy on arranging and environmental issues, although not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Situations article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how men and women from very various Expert backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in such disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reviews spell their names, are becoming synonymous Along with the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning through the sea Irish Periods coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by way of waist-higher water throughout a storm to photograph the site Irish Situations and René Collier waded via waistline-large water all through a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Times are phrases that appeared continuously in protection, reflecting each the Bodily reality from the coastline along with the symbolic mother nature on the act. For supporters in the plaintiffs, these steps demonstrated dedication; for critics, they illustrated what they see being an abnormal method.
Given that the High Court proceedings carry on, the result stays unsure. The court need to establish if the wall as designed complies with scheduling permission and whether any encroachment right into a Special Spot of Conservation has occurred. The authorized arguments are advanced, involving interpretation of maps, tidal facts, and setting up problems. However the human ingredient stays central: neighbours who ought to Dwell together with each other very long following the authorized expenses happen to be paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over design functions at the website on Dublin Highway, Sutton, nevertheless the implications of the case prolong outside of that address. For planners, builders, and people alike, the dispute serves for a reminder of the significance of clarity in preparing permissions and sensitivity in coastal advancement. In addition, it underscores how immediately a local disagreement can escalate when fundamental challenges including environmental protection and home rights are perceived to be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand remains a location of purely natural magnificence and contested boundaries. The wall within the centre with the dispute stands partially constructed, a physical manifestation of unresolved lawful concerns. Regardless of whether it can ultimately be altered, eliminated, or done as planned will rely on the court’s conclusions. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will possible keep on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to The most intently watched scheduling disputes in north Dublin in recent years.