A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out between possible neighbours in excess of the development of a wall at a coastal internet site in a north Dublin suburb, a situation which has captivated nationwide focus next an Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed family household at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of preparing breaches, environmental worries, and very long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Occasions write-up about René Collier and the Irish Instances report about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has progressed right into a extremely publicised legal struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over construction works at the site on Dublin Road, Sutton, where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a corporation director respectively, seek out to build their spouse and children dwelling. The case is becoming emblematic of broader disputes alongside Eire’s coastline, exactly where development pressures collide with environmental protections as well as the sensitivities of founded residents. In accordance with the Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall staying made by their prospective neighbours goes past the boundaries permitted underneath setting up authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both of those inhabitants of Dublin Road, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases of their setting up permission by creating a wall outside of the boundaries of their website, bringing about an encroachment on a Exclusive Space of Conservation. The SAC designation is central on the dispute, as a result places are subject matter to stringent controls underneath European and Irish environmental law. Inside their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments could have Long lasting ecological consequences, particularly in a delicate coastal setting including Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They're in breach in their preparing authorization, and say the wall, which happens to be partially developed, is in the right placement. Their legal crew has characterised the motion as an attempt to hold off or frustrate a lawful advancement. The pair accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding in an effort to preserve their look at, an allegation that's been recurring in court docket and referenced in coverage of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of many coastal setting up disputes, where by views of The ocean are both equally really prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained spectacular attempts by the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by means of ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, according to sworn proof referenced during the Irish Times. In one account, Rene Collier waded by means of midsection-substantial h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Periods, a picture which includes considering that grow to be emblematic from the depth with the dispute. These actions weren't merely symbolic; they had been intended to gather Visible evidence from the wall’s situation relative to tidal lines and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location in the sea Irish Instances noted, describing how the two Gentlemen entered the drinking water through critical weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm drinking water to photograph the positioning grew to become one of the most putting descriptions to emerge from court reporting. The Irish Times report about accountant Paul Feely noted that these types of actions were being cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ perception the wall extended into a region impacted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was being encroached upon.
The situations at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been protected in detail by the nationwide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Periods 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Instances January 27 2026 became commonly searched phrases as visitors sought to know the history and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court read additional submissions on no matter if interim orders should be granted to halt development pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a essential moment within the legal timeline.
On the core from the dispute is actually a disagreement more than boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely manage which the wall, as created, goes past what was authorised and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, has become referred to as meticulous in his examination of scheduling paperwork, maps, and ailments hooked up for the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have the two stressed that their motion is enthusiastic by problem for environmental protection and adherence to scheduling law. They reject statements that the case is about preserving a private watch, insisting alternatively that it is about making sure that growth at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limits. In affidavits, they have explained their extended-standing relationship to the region as well as their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a few merely endeavoring to make a family members household in accordance Together with the legislation. They deny that the wall encroaches with a Unique Place of Conservation and say that each one works are completed according to Qualified suggestions and accepted plans. Their attorneys have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the spectacular steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, which includes coming into The ocean during a storm, will not change the fundamental specifics.
The situation has also raised broader questions about how organizing disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute in excess of design of wall at coastal site is becoming a shorthand description for any situation that numerous observers see as significantly widespread. As sea amounts rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation concerning private land, public foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming much more contentious.
The Irish Periods short article about René Collier noted the businessman had previously been involved with regional advocacy on organizing and environmental challenges, while not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Occasions article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people today from quite distinct professional backgrounds can discover themselves aligned in these disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reviews spell their names, have become synonymous Along with the Sutton Strand situation.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site within the sea Irish Occasions protection emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by midsection-higher drinking water in the course of a storm René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the site to photograph the website Irish Occasions and René Collier waded by means of midsection-significant water through a storm to photograph the website Irish Situations are phrases that appeared consistently in coverage, reflecting both the Actual physical truth in the coastline and the symbolic mother nature in the act. For supporters in the plaintiffs, these steps demonstrated commitment; for critics, they illustrated the things they see being an extreme tactic.
As the High Court proceedings go on, the end result remains uncertain. The court need to decide whether the wall as constructed complies with organizing permission and whether or not any encroachment into a Special Area of Conservation has transpired. The authorized arguments are complex, involving interpretation of maps, tidal info, and organizing ailments. Yet the human factor remains central: neighbours who must Reside together with one another very long following the authorized expenditures have already been paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of design functions at the website on Dublin Street, Sutton, but the implications of the situation lengthen past that address. For planners, builders, and people alike, the dispute serves like a reminder of the value of clarity in arranging permissions and sensitivity in coastal enhancement. What's more, it underscores how speedily a local disagreement can escalate when elementary issues for instance environmental protection and property legal rights are perceived for being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains an area of organic natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall at the centre of the dispute stands partly crafted, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved authorized concerns. Regardless of whether it'll finally be altered, eliminated, or concluded as prepared will count on the courtroom’s conclusions. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will likely continue to look in headlines, joined indelibly to one of the most closely viewed setting up disputes in north Dublin lately.